Was Donald Trump elected or appointed?

“The people will believe what the media tells them they believe.”

George Orwell

To finance the Vietnam war, in the year 1971, Richard Nixon made the unilateral cancellation of backing the US$ with gold, reducing the global demand for the  US currency, and dropping its value against European currencies. 

To restore the global demand and prevent the further downfall of the US$, in the year 1973, Henry Kissinger persuaded the Saudis to trade their oil exclusively in the US currency.

As long as OPEC kept on trading oil in US$ and didn’t reduce its production, the American currency and economy remain stable.

However, by the year 2070, world’s oil reserves will be depleted.

“BP’s annual report on proved global oil reserves says that as of the end of 2013, Earth has nearly 1.688 trillion barrels of crude, which will last 53.3 years at current rates of extraction. This figure is 1.1 percent higher than that of the previous year. In fact, during the past 10 years proven reserves have risen by 27 percent, or more than 350 billion barrels.”

http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/BPs-Latest-Estimate-Says-Worlds-Oil-Will-Last-53.3-Years.html

Depletion of world’s oil reserves would drastically reduce the demand for American currency, turning it into a worthless piece of paper, and destroy its economy.

To preserve the value of its currency, USA needs a new source of energy that would be traded exclusively in US$, such as the liquefied natural gas.

The world’s largest liquefied natural gas reserves are located in the Persian Gulf, stretching beneath the territorial waters of Iran and Qatar.

Qatar has already undertaken substantial negotiations with neighbouring countries to allow the construction of its new gas pipeline to supply Europe through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.

“Qatar has proposed a gas pipeline from the Gulf to Turkey in a sign the emirate is considering a further expansion of exports from the world’s biggest gasfield after it finishes an ambitious programme to more than double its capacity to produce liquefied natural gas (LNG).”

https://www.thenational.ae/business/qatar-seeks-gas-pipeline-to-turkey-1.520795

Depletion of world’s oil reserves would drastically reduce the demand for American currency, turning it into a worthless piece of paper, and destroy its economy.

To preserve the value of its currency, USA needs a new source of energy that would be traded exclusively in US$, such as the liquefied natural gas.

The world’s largest liquefied natural gas reserves are located in the Persian Gulf, stretching beneath the territorial waters of Iran and Qatar.

Qatar has already undertaken substantial negotiations with neighbouring countries to allow the construction of its new gas pipeline to supply Europe through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.

“In 2009 – the same year former French foreign minister Dumas alleges the British began planning operations in Syria – Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar that would run a pipeline from the latter’s North field, contiguous with Iran’s South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets – albeit crucially bypassing Russia.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines

In late 2010, President Assad signed an agreement with Iran and Iraq to construct a new gas pipeline that would supply Europe with gas extracted from Iran, instead of Qatar.

“More than a year ago, a $10 billion Pipelineistan deal was clinched between Iran, Iraq and Syria for a natural gas pipeline to be built by 2016 from Iran’s giant South Pars field, traversing Iraq and Syria, with a possible extension to Lebanon.”

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/08/201285133440424621.html

Within three months of signing the Russian backed Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline, which was due to be completed in 2016, BBC reported on the first democratic protests in Syria, demanding President Assad’s resignation.

Consequently, in December 2011, US troops pulled out of Iraq, which enabled the establishment of ISIS, a terrorist organisation set out to destroy the USA using weapons manufactured by their enemy.

However, ISIS was a unique kind of terrorist organisation, Islamic State organisation with a mission to undermine the development of another Islamic State, by:

  • Fighting against Assad, an enemy of ISIS’ enemy;
  • Intercepting Assad’s support from Iran: and
  • Preventing the construction of the Iranian gas pipeline through Iraq.

The enemies of Iran and Russia were the only ones who in fact benefited from ISIS.

When future economies of the two superpowers are dependant on who gets to supply Europe with natural gas, Qatar or Iran, the war between Russia and the USA was imminent.

Compared to the EURO traded gas from Iran, supplying Europe with gas sold in US$ from Qatar would preserve the long-term value of the American currency.

Hillary wanted President Assad removed.

To protect the international reputation that the US means what it says, as the next President, she had to oust the Syrian President, and this required taking out the Russian military presence too!

Therefore, to avoid the imminent war with Russia over Assad, Donald Trump was appointed as the 45th US President.

When ABC News raised concerns over the illegal votes that secured him the presidency, Donald Trump replied:

“We’re gonna find out. And — and, by the way, when I say you’re gonna find out. You can never really find, you know, there are gonna be — no matter what numbers we come up with there are gonna be lots of people that did things that we’re not going to find out about.”

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/transcript-abc-news-anchor-david-muir-interviews-president/story?id=45047602

But, then again, according to President Trump, perhaps you are not supposed to know the “things that we’re not going to find out about.”

Advertisements

Is this why our tax dodgers are so desperate to leave the EU single market?

“People are sheep. MSM is the Shepherd.”

Ian Almond

Reflecting upon the Supreme Court’s decision that the British Parliament must decide whether or not to trigger Article 50, in the year 2016, Mr Farage revealed the crucial aspect of his Brexit campaign, stating:

“Well, we would be half-Brexiting is my guess – is that legally we may get out of some aspects of EU membership, but if we stay in the single market, we finish up with all our businesses being regulated somewhere else and indeed a court in Luxembourg that can overrule our own Supreme Court and if that happens it will a supreme act of betrayal.”

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37861487

Recently, the British Prime Minister, Theresa May reassured Mr Farage that his ambition to free Great Britain from the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg will be implemented in full:

“The second hard fact is that even after we have left the jurisdiction of the ECJ, EU law and the decisions of the ECJ will continue to affect us… But, in the future, the EU treaties and hence EU law will no longer apply in the UK.”

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/03/theresa-mays-our-future-partnership-speech-in-full/

However, not all Leavers will look forward to ending ECJ’s jurisdiction in the UK.

From the year 2019, the ECJ will ensure that all EU member states implement its new Anti Tax Avoidance Directive and bring to an end the tax-avoiding practices by the EU citizens or businesses, its development coincides with key Brexit momentous decisions.

In 2012, the European Commission produced their action plan to clamp down on tax avoidance, and within a month, David Cameron announced that he changed his mind and that he favours an EU referendum.

In 2016, the European Commission produced the first draft of the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive and within a month, David Cameron announced the date for EU referendum.

In 2019, all EU member states have to implement the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, by which time the UK is expected to leave the EU and its Directives.

Although Cameron campaigned to remain, one can’t help wondering why he failed to convey to the British People the biggest benefit of remaining in the EU, such as the fact that wealthy British individuals and businesses will no longer be able to avoid paying their due taxes.

Of course, Brexiteers continue to argue that the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, attempted to block EU’s clampdown on tax avoidance.

However, once he became the President of the European Commission in 2013, Juncker’s institution has been actively engaged in drafting new legal framework to tackle the increasing and aggressive tax avoidance.

Compared to the British tax havens that are mostly used by the British greedy wealthy elite, Luxembourg serves as a tax haven mostly for non-EU citizens and businesses.

The new EU Directive targets only individuals or businesses that generate profits within their member states, therefore it won’t affect much Luxembourg’s tax havens.

Majority people and business owners that either promoted or funded campaigns to leave the EU are implicated in tax-dodging practices.

Even Mr Farage avoided paying taxes by setting up an offshore fund in the Isle of Man:

“Nigel Farage opened an offshore trust fund in a plan to slash his tax bill, a Mirror investigation has revealed.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ukip-leader-nigel-farage-admits-1972988

Other prominent Brexiteers who have avoided paying their due taxes to UK tax authorities include:

  • Arron Banks, who is associated with and profits from companies set up in the British Virgin Islands and Gibraltar tax havens.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/15/panama-papers-reveal-offshore-secrets-arron-banks-brexit-backer

  • Sir James Dyson, who partially avoided his full share of tax by setting up companies in Malta, the Isle of Man and Luxembourg tax havens.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/05/-sp-luxembourg-tax-files-tax-avoidance-industrial-scale

  • Lord Ashcroft, who avoided paying his taxes by registering as a resident Belize and setting up a trust fund in Bermuda.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/paradise-papers-latest-lord-ashcroft-house-of-lords-non-domicile-status-uk-belize-a8039251.html

The list of prominent pro-Brexit newspapers are owned by individuals who avoid paying tax to UK tax authorities, such as:

  • The owner of the Sun newspaper, Rupert Murdoch avoided paying his taxes by setting up his companies in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands tax havens.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/299543.stm

  • The owners of the Telegraph newspaper, David and Frederick Barclay avoided paying their taxes by registering as residents of Sark island, located in the Channel Island tax haven.

https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-update-another-tax-haven-loophole

  • The owner of the Daily Mail newspaper, Lord Rothermere avoided paying his taxes by inheriting the Daily Mail through an offshore trust set up in the Channel Island tax haven and being registered as “non-dom”.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jul/10/whos-who-britain-legal-offshore-tax-avoidance-james-dyson

  • The owner of the Express newspaper, Richard Desmond avoided paying his taxes by setting up a company in Luxembourg’s tax haven.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2012/panorama-truth-about-tax.html

Therefore, rather than the British people, the only ones that will benefit from leaving the EU are the wealthy British tax-dodgers!