And yet almost everyone hates him!

“The people will believe what the media tells them they believe.” 

George Orwell


The war in Syria started way back in 1971 when President Nixon decided to no longer back US$ with the federal gold reserves, circulating additional money that was required to support the Vietnam War after Kissinger successfully negotiated with leaders of major oil-producing countries to trade their liquid commodities solely in the US$.

For as long as there is a demand for oil, there is also a demand for US$, thus preserving the value of the American currency, and it worked well for the USA and the rest of the world.

The stability of the US$ ensured a stability of oil prices and consequently a global economic stability.

However,  world’s oil reserves will be depleted by 2070.

“BP’s annual report on proved global oil reserves says that as of the end of 2013, Earth has nearly 1.688 trillion barrels of crude, which will last 53.3 years at current rates of extraction. This figure is 1.1 percent higher than that of the previous year. In fact, during the past 10 years proven reserves have risen by 27 percent, or more than 350 billion barrels.”

Depletion of world’s oil reserves will drastically reduce the demand for American currency, which would ultimately destroy its economy,  capitalism and consequently destabilise the entire world.

Therefore, to preserve the value of its currency, USA needs a new source of energy that would continue trading in US$, such as liquefied natural gas, which would prolong demand of the American currency beyond 2070.

The world’s largest liquefied natural gas reserves are located in the Persian Gulf, stretching beneath the territorial waters of Iran and Qatar.

Qatar has already undertaken substantial negotiations with neighbouring countries to allow the construction of its new gas pipeline to supply Europe through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.

“Qatar has proposed a gas pipeline from the Gulf to Turkey in a sign the emirate is considering a further expansion of exports from the world’s biggest gasfield after it finishes an ambitious programme to more than double its capacity to produce liquefied natural gas (LNG).”

However, as early as 2009, President Assad made it clear that instead of the proposed Qatar gas pipeline, he favours the construction of the Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline.

“In 2009 – the same year former French foreign minister Dumas alleges the British began planning operations in Syria – Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar that would run a pipeline from the latter’s North field, contiguous with Iran’s South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets – albeit crucially bypassing Russia.”

In late 2010, President Assad signed an agreement with Iran and Iraq to construct a new gas pipeline that would supply Europe with gas extracted from Iran, instead of Qatar.

“More than a year ago, a $10 billion Pipelineistan deal was clinched between Iran, Iraq and Syria for a natural gas pipeline to be built by 2016 from Iran’s giant South Pars field, traversing Iraq and Syria, with a possible extension to Lebanon.”

Within three months from signing the Russian backed Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline, which was due to be completed in 2016, BBC reported on the first democratic protests in Syria, demanding President Assad’s resignation.

Consequently, in December 2011, US troops pulled out of Iraq, which enabled the establishment of ISIS, a terrorist organisation set out to destroy the USA whilst using weapons manufactured by their enemy.

However, ISIS was a unique kind of terrorist organisation, Islamic State organisation with a mission to undermine the development of another Islamic State, by:

  • Fighting against Assad, an enemy of ISIS’ enemy;
  • Intercepting Assad’s support from Iran: and
  • Preventing the construction of the Iranian gas pipeline through Iraq.

Therefore, if actions speak louder than words, the enemies of Iran and Russia were the only ones who truly benefited from ISIS.

When economic stability of the two superpowers is dependant on who gets to supply Europe with natural gas, Qatar or Iran, a nuclear war between Russia and the USA was imminent.

Supplying Europe with gas from Qatar, which would be traded in US$, would preserve the long-term value of the American currency and destroy the Russian economy.

Supplying Europe with gas from Iran, probably traded in EURO, would destroy the American currency and making Russia the global energetical empire.

Hillary wanted Assad removed. If she were to become the next President, she had to attack Russian military establishments that were positioned in Syria to ensure that its President remains.

When asked by ABC News about the illegal votes that secured him the presidency, Donald Trump replied:

“We’re gonna find out. And — and, by the way, when I say you’re gonna find out. You can never really find, you know, there are gonna be — no matter what numbers we come up with there are gonna be lots of people that did things that we’re not going to find out about.”

It seems that lots of people that did things that we’re not going to find out aboutsuch as averting a potential war with Russia, by appointing Donald Trump as the 45th US President.


Mrs May, is this why you want to end the ECJ’s jurisdiction in the UK?

“How do I possess that power, that sovereignty? Through privacy. Through the fact that nobody knows. Through the fact that I have to account to no-one.”


Ian Fleming in Dr No

In her recent Brexit speech, British Prime Minister Theresa May reassured Mr Farage that his ambition of freeing the UK from the ECJ, will be implemented in full.

Reflecting on Supreme Court’s decision that the British Parliament must decide whether or not to trigger Article 50, Mr Farage revealed the crucial aspect of his Brexit campaign, stating:

“Well, we would be half-Brexiting is my guess – is that legally we may get out of some aspects of EU membership, but if we stay in the single market, we finish up with all our businesses being regulated somewhere else and indeed a court in Luxembourg that can overrule our own Supreme Court and if that happens it will a supreme act of betrayal.”

Whilst majority of other issues are still negotiable, British Prime Minister confirmed that:

“The second hard fact is that even after we have left the jurisdiction of the ECJ, EU law and the decisions of the ECJ will continue to affect us… That means cases will be determined in our courts. But, where appropriate, our courts will continue to look at the ECJ’s judgments, as they do for the appropriate jurisprudence of other countries’ courts… But, in the future, the EU treaties and hence EU law will no longer apply in the UK.”


However, not all leavers will look forward to ending ECJ’s jurisdiction in the UK.

As of year 2019, ECJ will ensure that all EU member states implement its new Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, forcing wealthy tax-dodgers to pay their dues, however Mrs May made it clear that she will end its jurisdiction over UK and secure data protection arrangements for UK businesses.

Following Euro’s decline, caused by EU’s Greek bailout and the SFR’s shocking revelation that wealthy Greeks stored around €80 billion in Swiss banks to avoid paying their taxes, the European Commission decided to bring an end to tax-avoiding practices amongst its member states.

The European Commission began working on the EU’s new Anti Tax Avoidance Directive in 2013, endorsed it in 2016, and its member states must implement it by 2019.

The dates of the development of EU’s Anti Tax Avoidance Directive coincides with key Brexit developments.

In 2012, the European Commission produced their action plan to clamp down on tax avoidance, and within a month, David Cameron announced that he changed his mind and that he favours an EU referendum.

In 2016, the European Commission produced the first draft of the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive and within a month, David Cameron announced the date for EU referendum.

In 2019, all EU member states have to implement the EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, by which time the UK is expected to leave the EU and its Directives.

EU’s Anti Tax Avoidance Directive aims to ensure a stable fiscal environment for its member states, decent healthcare, education and public services.

ECJ is the institution that will force Irish government to collect the outstanding €13bn in taxes from Apple, and one could easily comprehend why Mr Farage and other tax dodgers campaigned so hard to terminate its jurisdiction in the UK!

In fact, the majority of highly influential people and owners of establishments who campaigned for Brexit are elitists who believe that others should pay their due taxes, not them.

Even Mr Farage avoided paying taxes by setting up an offshore fund in the Isle of Man.

Other prominent Brexiteers who have avoided paying tax to UK tax authorities are:

  • Arron Banks, who is associated with and profits from companies set up in the British Virgin Islands and Gibraltar tax havens.

  • Sir James Dyson, who partially avoided his full share of tax by setting up companies in Malta, the Isle of Man and Luxembourg tax havens.

  • Lord Ashcroft, who avoided paying his taxes by registering as a resident Belize and setting up a trust fund in Bermuda.

The list of prominent pro-Brexit newspapers are owned by individuals who avoid paying tax to UK tax authorities are:

  • The owner of the Sun newspaper, Rupert Murdoch avoided paying his taxes by setting up his companies in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands tax havens.

  • The owners of the Telegraph newspaper, David and Frederick Barclay avoided paying their taxes by registering as residents of Sark island, located in the Channel Island tax haven.

  • The owner of the Daily Mail newspaper, Lord Rothermere avoided paying his taxes by inheriting the Daily Mail through an offshore trust set up in the Channel Island tax haven and being registered as “non-dom”.

  • The owner of the Express newspaper, Richard Desmond avoided paying his taxes by setting up a company in Luxembourg’s tax haven.

So, now you know why most of our wealthy tax-dodgers campaigned to leave the EU.

Thanks to hardworking and struggling people who voted to leave the EU, who managed to prolong the ongoing harsh austerity measures, leading to privatization of the NHS,  our wealthy elite will continue with their tax-dodging practices, free from EU’s Anti Tax Avoidance Directive and ECJ’s rulings.